Does Exist? “I love you.” These three little words might possibly be the most powerful statement one can make to another person. In life, most yearn for the intimate affection that a certain someone can provide them. Women dream of their Prince Charming to come and sweep them off their feet, while men search for the love of their life that sets their heart on fire. But what happens when love is thrown around without a second thought? Has this four letter word become an overused clich’e? Has love been replaced with lust? Is there such a thing as true love? This last question has been asked throughout history, while many have argued and debated over the final answer.
We, as a society, have become a loveless, sex crazed group of people with no concern for any emotion or attachment in our lives. So does this mean that true love does not exist? No. This only shows that achieving the deepest of feelings takes work that our fast-food eating, TV watching generation is not prepared to handle. I believe that true love does exist, but has merely been pushed aside by convenience, superficiality, and apathy. It seems that over the years, true love is expressed less and less. We are bombarded with holiday cards filled with someone else’s words, and are practically forced to send our love in an email.
How often do we actually sit down and write out our feelings to the one we love? “To My Dear and Loving Husband,” however, is the quintessential love letter. Anne Bradstreet shares her feelings to her husband in such a loving way that could make anyone’s heart melt. According to BellaOnline, Bradstreet was, “married to governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony and had eight children.” Even though her marriage might have become filled with routines and lost a little passion, the poet never loses the love for her husband. She states that the power of her .”.. love is such that rivers cannot quench” (Bradstreet, 7). Bradstreet expresses her emotions to be so strong that not even a roaring river can possibly satisfy them.
She prizes her husband’s .”.. love more than whole mines of gold/ Or all the riches that the East doth hold,” (Bradstreet, 5-6) meaning she values his affection more than any amount of money she could obtain. The sonnet goes on to prove how everlasting true love can be when Bradstreet states, .”.. when we live no more, we may live ever” (12). She wishes to be in love with her husband eternally, even after they both die. The love that Anne Bradstreet expresses in her poem, “To My Dear and Loving Husband,” may not have been the easiest thing for her to write.
As a Puritan living in Boston in 1678, it was highly unacceptable for a woman to be so open with her feelings. Within her community, “any woman who sought to use her wit, charm, or intelligence… found herself ridiculed, banished, or executed by the Colony’s powerful group of male leaders” (Anderegg). “Her domain was to be domestic, separated from the linked affairs of church and state, even ‘deriving her ideas of God from the contemplations of her husband’s excellencies,’ ” according to the BiographyofAnneBradstreet. Even with this knowledge, Bradstreet still took the chance of writing down the love for her husband with words.
Another obstacle she was faced with was her struggle for self-importance, when her culture clearly valued God above anyone else. Love during the Puritan era was meant only to occur between God and oneself, and people were not permitted to write about feelings for another person. Love is a powerful thing and can encourage people to do things they normally wouldn’t. In this case, Bradstreet went against everything she knew to express her feelings for her husband. Although love can be the most wonderful feeling in the world, it is not the answer to all of one’s problems. Edna St.
Vincent Millay, author of “Love Is Not All,” makes this clear in her poem. She states that love .”.. is not meat nor drink/ Nor slumber nor a roof against the rain” (Millay, 1-2). She makes it quite obvious that people need more than love to survive in life.
In fact, Millay says that, .”.. many a man is making friends with death/… as I speak, for lack of love alone” (7-8). She finds it ridiculous that some would commit suicide for such a small thing as having no one to love. “I might be driven to sell your love for peace, / Or trade the memory of this night for food,” (12-13) she says, imagining a situation where she must choose between love and basic necessities.
However, in the last line of the poem, after thinking about this sacrifice, she simply answers, “I do not think I would,” (14) proving that in the end, she would rather be left with love. Millay explains that some people do not cherish love as they should, and would give up a special moment for something tangible. She clearly shows that although she realizes love is not the only goal in life, she would not trade her feelings for anything else in the world. In the poem, “True Love,” by Wislawa Szymborska, love is depicted as a revolting and repulsive act looked upon by the public.
Szymborska questions true love, asking, “Is it normal, / is it serious, is it practical?” (1-2) With all the time and effort that is put into love, most would wonder about the same things as Szymborska. The poet begins to criticize those in love that are “Placed on the same pedestal for no good reason, / drawn randomly from millions” (5-6). Those who are envious of couples in love often feel this way too, wondering why it couldn’t be them instead. She says that it is unfair that love chooses only some, .”.. disrupt[ing] our painstakingly erected principles” (12). Szymborska speaks badly of love by saying, “Look at the happy couple.
/ Couldn’t they at least try to hide it, / fake a little depression for their friends’s ake!” (14-16) Everyone, at one time or another, has felt awkwardly around an overly affectionate couple, but secretly wishes that it were their cheeks receiving kisses in public. Szymborska’s opinion on the subject is similar to many peoples’ these days, however, even though she shows a direct hatred for the subject of love, never is it doubted in the poem that true love exists. She asks if love is .”.. really necessary,” (27) stating that “Perfectly good children are born without its help” (30). She goes on to say that those who do not believe in true love can continue thinking so, and that “their faith will make it easier for them to live and die” (35). She’s basically telling the critics of love to continue in their beliefs, for being na ” ive will help them to cope with their loneliness.
The definition of love, according to dictionary. com is “a deep, tender, ineffable feeling of affection and solicitude toward a person… [with]… a sense of underlying oneness.” When asked for personal definitions of love, people reply with various answers. In “Let me not to the marriage of true minds,” Shakespeare starts out giving his own guidelines of marriage when saying, “let me not to the marriage of true minds/ admit impediments” (1-2).
By this, he means that love cannot be stopped as marriages can. True love can thrive without boundaries or rules, both of which are the reason marriages are often prevented. He says “love is not love/ which alters when it alteration finds” (2-3). This means that love is not true if it changes when one notices their significant other has, too.
Those in love accept the changes that their partner makes, and often times, changes with them. Shakespeare feels love should not vary when temptation is present, because .”.. it is an ever-fixed mark, / that looks on tempests and is never shaken” (5-6). Love is the .”.. star to every wandering bark,” (7) a constant guide as we wonder through life.
He comments that love is not .”.. Time’s fool, though rosy lips and cheeks/ within his bending sickle’s compass come” (9-10). People’s love does not lessen as beauty and youth fades from the face, which it often does. “Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks, /but it bears out even to the edge of doom,” (11-12) means that love does not waiver over time, but rather lasts until death. At the end of the poem, Shakespeare says that “If this be error and upon me proved, / I never writ, nor no man ever loved” (13-14). He is saying here, that if what he has written about true love is false, then none of his works are worthwhile to read, because so many of them are based on the topic of love.
His writings have come from the observations and experiences he has had, and if he were to be wrong about it all, then no one has ever really experienced true love. Although most people view love to be a random occurrence between two people that happens purely and naturally, some psychologist’s opinions differ greatly. Psychologist, Sigmund Freud, .”.. looks at love from the perspective of the sexual drive” (Psychological). His beliefs originate from the theory that a child’s first love is his mother.
Later on in life, a male grows up desiring the pleasures his mother once gave him, while a female child grows up with her father as the object of love. Freud believes “adult love and sexuality [is] an extension of… infantile forms” (Psychological). He views love as being the “coexistence of ‘two currents’: tenderness / affection , and sensuality” (Psychological). The first current, Freud explains, comes from the “care and nourishment” (Psychological) a child receives from his parents when he is little, while the second is “related to sexual energy, or libido” (Psychological). Freud believes that happy love is the product of the two currents.
However, neurosis can occur if the currents aren’t functioning together or if one is unavailable. Freud believed that “sexual instincts are said to have a gratification-seeking aim, and the inhibition of this aim can make sexual desire being transformed into affection in long-term relationships such as marriage” (Psychological). He also states that it’s ‘very usual for directly sexual impulsions, short-lived in themselves, to be transformed into a lasting and purely affectionate tie; and the consolidation of a passionate love marriage rests to a large extent upon this process’ (Psychological). Basically, Freud believes that a lack of passion is what causes closeness and familiarity that is in a relationship. Another view of love comes from the psychologists and authors of Love And The Expansion Of Self: Understanding Attraction And Satisfaction, Aron and Aron. They believe that because all humans strive for self expansion, we look for those who will provide us with the best opportunities of improving ourselves.
These two also believe that their theory can help clear up many .”.. controversial issues related to attraction,” (Psychological) such as the contradictory “birds of a feather flock together” and “opposites attract.” Aron and Aron explain this inconsistency as the “[mere reflection of] the roles similarity plays in different phases of a relationship” (Psychological). At the start of a relationship, “similarity serves as a ‘precondition variable'” (Psychological). “After the perceived possibility, however, it is the opposite of this precondition variable that determines the development of the relationship,” (Psychological) says Aron and Aron. Later in the relationship, it is the differences that cause people to determine whether their significant other still provide them with self expansion.
Basically, these two believe that instead of being about attraction and affection, love is a self-centered act focused on bettering oneself. There are thousands of different opinions on love, ranging from good to bad, and from real to nonexistent. I personally believe that true love is real, and is out there for anybody willing to give it a chance. Throughout the years, countless love poems have been written by those who have either experienced love with another, or have seen love experienced by someone else. Love can be one of the strongest and binding elements that we know of on this earth, and at the same time, one of the most frail and fragile things we will deal with in life. Lately, our society has turned love into a prissy, unmanly holiday in which it is embarrassing to participate.
I think that we should embrace love with every chance we get, for after all, it is one of the greatest things we will ever experience. Works CitedAndregg, Caron. “To My Dear And Loving Husband.” BellaOnline. 01 Mar. 2005 web Anne. “To My Dear and Loving Husband.” Making Arguments about Literature: A Compact Guide And Anthology.
Ed. John Schilb and John Clifford. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2005. 346-347.” Love.” Dictionary. com.
25 Feb. 2005 web Edna St. Vincent. “Love Is Not All.” Making Arguments about Literature: A Compact Guide And Anthology. Ed.
John Schilb and John Clifford. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2005. 349.” Psychological Theories About the Dynamics of Love (I).” About. 01 Mar. 2005 web Raymond Lloyd.
“Sexuality and Love.” A Guide to Psychology and its Practice. 01 Mar. 2005. web love. htm#n 4 Shakespeare, William. “Let me not to the marriage of true minds.” Making Arguments about Literature: A Compact Guide And Anthology.
Ed. John Schilb and John Clifford. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2005. 345-346. Szymborska, Wislawa.
“True Love.” Making Arguments about Literature: A Compact Guide And Anthology. Ed. John Schilb and John Clifford. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2005.
725-726. Wood lief, Ann. “Anne Bradstreet.” 01 Mar. 2005 web.