The Southern Social Themes of William Faulkner undoubtedly ranks one of the best and most influential writers both in America and in history. Among his various works of art, the most famous ones are those set in his fictional Yoknapatawpha County, which is molded out of his “native soil.” Despite their Southern setting, these works convey something universally true. As Faulkner often claims, he is just a story-teller, telling about man in conflict, about how he “endures and prevails.” Before he received due recognition, Faulkner wrote quite a few short stories which he expected would help him improve his economic condition, so that he could write novels at ease. Nevertheless, although he was motivated by economic interests, many of these short stories turned out very prominent.’ Barn Burning’ is one of Faulkner’s most frequently anthologized, though its prose is a bit more ponderous than the garrulous first-person narration of ‘Emily.’ Set roughly 30 years after the Civil War, the story focuses on two members of the Snopes family: Ab Snopes, a poor sharecropper who takes out his frustrations against the post-Civil War aristocracy by burning barns, and his adolescent son, ‘Sarty,’ who dislikes his father’s destructive tendencies and ultimately must choose between family and morality. This powerful coming-of-age story is notable for its conscientious prose styling, in which Faulkner mimics the inward turmoil and questions faced by his principal protagonist, as well as its carefully rendered settings of three historical milieus, each of which has important thematic concerns in the story: the sharecropper’s cabin, the planter’s mansion, and the town’s general store. Faulkner incorporated the basic narrative of the story into his novel The Hamlet, though it is told in vastly different language and tone.
Written as it was, at the ebb of the 1930 s, a decade of social, economic, and cultural tumult, the decade of the Great Depression, William Faulkner’s short story ‘Barn Burning’ may be read and discussed by most of us as just that — a story of the ’30 s, for ‘Barn Burning’ offers students insights into these years as they were lived by the nation and the South and captured by our artists. This story was first published in June of 1939 in Harper’s Magazine and later awarded the 0. Henry Memorial Award for the best short story of the year. Whether read alone, as part of a thematic unit on the Depression era, or as an element of an interdisciplinary course of the Depression ’30 s, ‘Barn Burning’ can be used to awaken students to the race, class, and economic turmoil of the decade. During the 1930 s, the Sartoris and Snopes families were overlapping entities in Faulkner’s imagination. These families with their opposing social values spurred his imagination at a time when he wrote about the passing of a conservative, agricultural South and the opening up of the South to a new era of modernization.
This depiction of the agrarian society of the Sartoris family connects Faulkner to the nostalgic yearnings for a past expressed in I’ll Take My Stand, the Fugitives’ manifesto of 1930, a book opening the decade yet echoing sentiments of past decades. At the start of our classroom discussion of ‘Barn Burning,’ we can explain the tenets of the Fugitives, their traditional, aristocratic attitudes, and their reverence for the landed gentry life style. We can focus on the description of the de Spain home and property, with its opulence and privilege, as representative of the Agrarians’ version of ‘the good life.’ Early we need to emphasize and discuss the attraction of the young boy Colonel Sartoris Snopes to the security and comfort of this style, his attraction to his namesake’s heritage. In his rendition of the Sartoris-like agrarian society, Faulkner acknowledges its dichotomy: the injustice, the lack of fair play, the blacks’s ubservience, and the divisiveness within the community which empire builders like the Sarto rises and the de Spain wrought. It is, of course, this very social inequity, the class distinction, and the economic inequality against which Sarty’s father Ab Snopes’ barn burning rails.
We now can lead our students to the evidence of these social injustices within the story by identifying exemplary moments and scenes. Specifically the concepts of sharecropper, poor white, and tenant farmer need to be fully defined and explored. Then the second courtroom scene in which de Spain exacts a payment of ‘twenty bushels of corn against your crop’ for the ruined rug can be discussed in the context of de Spain’s use of the words ‘contract’ and ‘commissary.’ The economic and legal sovereignty exerted by the owner in this system of repressive, feudal privilege which creates the near impossibility of the tenant’s ever ‘getting out from under’ will then become more fathomable for students. Foremost as such an example of social injustice is the encounter at the doorway of the de Spain mansion between the Snopes father and son and the de Spain black house servant.
At this moment young Colonel Sartoris Snopes (whose very names pit the aristocratic, land-owning rich against the tenant farmer poor) is ushered into the reality of class differences, that being the cleavage within the local community. The boy Sarty responds to the big house with a ‘surge of peace and joy.’ Its bigness-‘Hit’s big as a courthouse’-to his fresh eyes seems to guarantee safety, dignity, and peace from the barn-burning menace of his father. But the old, neatly dressed black servant in his linen jacket bars the door with his body and commands the father, who has deliberately put his foot down in a pile of fresh horse droppings, to ‘wipe ya foot, white man.’ Saying ‘Get out of my way, nigger,’ the father enters the house and imprints his besmeared footprints on the rug. Sarty experiences the interior of the house as a swirl of glittering chandeliers, gleaming gold frames, and curving carpeted stairs.
His image of Mrs. de Spain is one of a woman ‘wiping cake or biscuit dough from her hands.’ Young Sarty falls under the spell of the house, its possessions, its security.